'Stand' review or 'Shall we just sit pretty?
Stand, Chris Goode
Battersea Arts Centre, 22nd April 2015
Six
actors sit on stools, side by side, nestled within a small performing space.
There is the faintest shimmer of Question Time to the set-up – but these aren’t
politicians, they’re people. These are people who have chosen to fight for the
things they believe in and ‘Stand’ is their story, in their own words. This isn’t
a big show. It isn’t loud and it isn’t angry. Instead, in classic Chris Goode
style, this is an open, honest and compassionate piece of theatre, which uses
the plight of the individual to remind us of the deep importance of community.
The
six characters – or people – were all interviewed in Oxford, where ‘Stand’ first
played. It takes a little to work out their causes and their personalities, as
the spotlight gently darts across the stage, prompting each character to speak.
At first, these people seem a little bit silly. There is a woman who has devoted
her life to protesting about fracking, and she seems worryingly naive. There is
a university chap who signed on as a BP protestor because he fancied the lass
in charge. He seems shallow. The two older gentlemen, one fighting against the
destruction of a local boatyard and another taking on animal testing in Oxford,
seem inflated and idealistic in turn. The lady who has adopted a girl from an
orphanage seems a little meek and the woman who works with asylum seeks is so
very, very angry. Are these the characters who are meant to inspire us to take
action?
Chris
Goode has written and directed ‘Stand’ and he builds things gently, softly and without
judgement. We are not asked to admire these characters and we are not asked to
adopt their causes. We are just encouraged to listen.
Gradually,
in a script that has been quite beautifully sewn together, the protestors on
stage become people. We learn about their backgrounds, their relationships, the
things that make them laugh and cry. The lady who works with asylum seekers
(Cathy Tyson, with velvety steel) talks frankly about an unbelievably tough
childhood, a time so strained that ‘just to survive was a rebellion’. The
fracking lady (Kelda Holmes) begins to positively spill over with gentle
optimism and one begins to love her for it. The BP protestor (Spencer Brown) might
be a little immature but then he stands up and delivers one of his
Shakespearean skits – performed in order to protest against BNP’s sponsorship
of the Bard – and the whole room tingles. The boatyard photographer (Michael
Fenton Stevens) all but burns up with disappointment and our hearts go out to
him and the animal rights protestor (Lawrence Werber), a twinkly eyed and
infectiously passionate gent, wins around the lot of us.
There
are two touches that lend this show a particular warmth and energy. The first
is the tiny interruptions, which remind us of the original interviews and the
real people behind these performances. At one point, the adoptive mother
(played with such soft wonder by Gwyneth Strong) gets up and leaves; ‘I’ve got
to go check on my puddings’. There are a few disruptions like this, which stop
us from falling too hard for the performances. The other choice is to make this
a verbatim script, which mimics the verbal tics of the interviewees. All the
stumbles and ‘likes’, mumbles and mistakes, are in here. This is such an
important touch. It means the actors cannot afford to put too much of
themselves in the performance – they absolutely have to respect the individual
quirks of the characters they now play. Those verbal tics also bring us back to
the reality behind these performances. They make us listen harder and listen
honestly and that, without a doubt, is where all activism begins.
Comments
Post a Comment