'Carmen Disruption' review or 'Is this my note?'
Carmen Disruption, Simon Stephens
Almeida Theatre, 17th April 2015
I used to know what to expect at
the Almeida. These days, with artistic director Rupert Goold screeching out of
the blocks, I don’t even know what the theatre is going to look like. When I
came to see Mike Bartlett’s electric new play, ‘Game’, the seating had been
entirely reconfigured to nestle around a central stage space. Now, with Simon
Stephen’s ‘Carmen Disruption’, the theatre has been roughly shaken up again. This
time, we’re funnelled through back-stage, led right past a dressing room –
where a startled-looking singer is applying her make-up - and then directed
right over the stage and finally to our seats. As we stride across Lizzie
Clachlan’s elegantly distressed set, we have to tip-toe around a hulking, dead bull.
Whatever you’re imagining, this bull is shit-loads bigger than that. We stumble
to our seats, already deeply immersed in the concerns of this show. Look how close
to vibrant, ugly life and death we have stumbled! Look at the pains we took to circle
around the edges of that huge and frightening bull. Look at how we didn’t even
look at each other!
‘Carmen Disruption’ was inspired
by the curious case of a real-life opera singer, Rinat Shahm, who has played
Carmen over 400 times in nearly 50 different productions. She is the ideal subject
for a writer concerned with the splintering and re-moulding of identity, which
Simon Stephens most definitely is. Stephens interviewed Shahm intensely and
then wove ‘Carmen Disruption’ around her story. The play unfolds principally in
London but also dots all about Europe. The principal characters from Bizet’s
opera are all in here but they are shadows loosely tied onto enigmatic
characters, who race about abandoned streets, connected with everything but
touching nothing.
Michael Longhurst is now a total
pro at holding together difficult, sprawling, yet super-precise productions. ‘Constellations’
and ‘The World of Extreme Happiness’ could have been washed away by their own
ceaseless and criss-crossing movement, were it not for Longhurst’s beautifully relaxed
yet rigorous direction. The same goes for ‘Carmen Disruption’, which could have
been massacred by a less assured and intelligent director. This is the lightest
and nimblest of plays but – thematically, visually, physically and musically –
it’s incredibly tight. There are moments when it feels like everything is
in total chaos – but there are also
minutely choreographed scenes in which every phrase, tic, pulsing chord and
solitary shaft of light seem to inform this play’s big ideas about loneliness,
obscured identities and obfuscating landscapes. Longhurst has the confidence to let the chaos
unravel and every connection fracture – but he also has the skill to pull the
show back together with just a few little twists, so that the stage, text and
performance pulse with meaning.
The opening few scenes are
dizzying, flamboyant and confusing. We’re left adrift in a world that we
vaguely recognise (the Royal Opera House keeps popping up and familiar streets,
bars and songs occasionally emerge) but can’t quite pin down. An opera singer (Viktoria
Vizin), dressed in Carmen’s traditional, tightly corseted but flowing costume, occasionally
bursts into song. The music (accompanied by some heavy chords from the two
cellists on stage) sounds familiar but the contemporary lyrics, which reference
mobile phones, are out of whack with the original libretto. We meet a character
called Carmen – only she is played by a preening and gloriously arrogant male-prostitute
(Jack Farthing, absolutely killing it onstage). We come across a lonely girl
called Micaëla (Katie West), who remains a total mystery for a long time, circling
around the edges of the action.
All the characters offer glimmers
of clarity, but everything is obscured and twisted, and clouded further by a
gloomy and fractured stage space. The one central character who might guide us
through this juddering ride is Sharon Small’s opera singer, who is playing
Carmen for the umpteenth time. She is somewhere in Europe, preparing for her
role once again and desperately hiding the photos in her airbnb room, in an attempt
to feel more at home. This lost lady is our guide and, although she talks in
bright clear sentences, she’s just as fucked as the rest of them: ‘I don’t know
where I end and she begins.’
Amid all this confusion lies the
dead bull, a huge and dark reminder of something that all these characters seem
to have forgotten. The bull is rarely directly acknowledged but, like the
traditionally-dressed opera singer – the ‘chorus’ of our tale – the bull speaks
of a passion and bloody-ness these characters have lost. This bull is
substance. It is flesh. It is the racing and gushing blood of life and death.
At one point (and gawd knows when
in this whirling and teasing show) the bull begins to breathe. The connections
between these characters have been getting just a little bit clearer and that
bull, slap bang in the middle of them, might just be responding. But the
characters still do not see him. There is such a fascinating interplay in here
between the images, sounds and emotions that we – the audience – respond to and
the reactions from the characters on stage take. We, the audience, have sat
down in this theatre and chosen, very consciously, to connect with the
characters on-stage. Despite all those obfuscations and ambiguities, we will
grow closer to these events and people playing out in front of us. We will form
some level of connection with these characters on stage – and, yet, they’ll never
even see us.
Stephens and Longhurst play with
the audience, teasing us with moments of clarity or exposed passion, which are
just as quickly shut down again. The obscured characters talk in a pared down
poetry that feels one step removed from real-life. Interestingly, it is the
most lyrical moments – the most stylized moments, which in some way are as far from
‘real’ speech as one might get – that get closest to the characters’ internal
lives. Again, Stephens teases us with the dichotomy of theatrical performance;
the idea that those moments of greatest honesty and insight are, in fact, the
moments when the playwright can be heard most strongly. It’s one of those weird
contradictions of theatrical performance, that the moments of arguably the most
artifice are also the most honest.
The same goes for music, which is
as dishonest as it is truthful. Many of the most stylistic moments in Longhurst’s
sexy-dance of a production - such as a tightly-choreographed scene in which all
the absent souls gyrate in unison - are accompanied by loud and emphatic music.
The music affects us deeply, but it is overtly theatrical too and, in some
ways, dishonest. Those two cellists on stage are there to amp up the ‘real’
human emotions in the play – yet every time their heavy chords intertwine with
the action, the moment becomes more self-conscious and arguably less ‘real’.
The greatest contradictory
presence on stage is the ‘chorus’ singer (played with unbridled passion by
Vizin), who is the most powerful yet diminished character on stage. She spends
a lot of time watching from the wings. When she is drawn into the action and
finally allowed to sing, she is always – always – cut off way too soon. Just as
her singing might reach some mighty pitch or evoke a spitting lust or rage, the
singer is forced back into the background.
This contemporary and
technology-led world - this world of i-Phones and Skype calls and dropped
internet connections and a bafflingly abstract finance sector (‘the selling of
the selling of the selling of the last thing that we sell’) – has no space for
Carmen. Her curving body, her music, passion and soul, does not fit into this
churning but cool new world. She does not belong here, despite the fact that
Carmen is bound up with absolutely everyone on stage.
Instead, this is a stage and
world that makes space for electronic screens – one of which is suspended above
the stage and flashes up with every transaction, email and text message that is
sent throughout the play. This is a stage that can make space for a stream of emptied-words
– but it does not have space for Carmen and it does not have space for that
huge black bull which, although present, is – until the very final moments –
almost roundly ignored. Look at the things we step right past! Look at the
things that we fail to see and consider the way we fail to listen. Right at the
close of the show, the ticker-tape flashes up with one last line: ‘And then there’s a moment – when you sing it.’
Silence throbs around us as the audience, connected for one last moment, quietly
reads that neon phrase that will never, ever sing.
Comments
Post a Comment