'Waste' review or 'We'll need a bigger bin darling!'
Waste, Harley Granville Barker
National Theatre, 10th November 2015
To mention or not to mention? Last night, a
man had a (presumed) heart attack in the stalls of the National Theatre a few
minutes before the end of Roger Michell’s production of Harley Granville Barker’s
play ‘Waste’. Many critics might choose not to mention this event and I
understand that approach – there’s etiquette to think of darling – but it was a
horrible moment, shared by all of us, which inevitably had a massive effect on
the show’s closing moments. It would be odd and dishonest not to mention it.
A few things to take away from this event:
one, the incredibly fast reaction of the doctor in the stalls. A woman cried
out ‘Is there a doctor in here?’ and said doctor clambered over the stalls in
about 2 seconds flat. I’ve never seen anyone move so quickly in the National
and it felt, to me, a visual confirmation of all that is wonderful about our doctors
and the NHS. Second: the reaction of the audience. For a minute, the whole
theatre felt stung. It was if something terrible had crept in beside us – but it
didn’t take long for a delicate murmur to flutter through the audience. It says
an awful lot about the Brits’ weird ability to push on through and made me
think deeply about our national character and the parts I like and do not like.
Finally: the reaction of the bods at the National, who decided to finish the
show – with the man stabilised but still lying down in the stalls. I don’t know
whether there is official protocol here and I do know it must have been a
horrible judgement call to make. But I wish to god they hadn’t done it. Never
have a few minutes in the theatre felt so completely pointless. It was a deeply
unsettling end to the night and one that I will be thinking about for a long
time. I do hope that the man and his family, wherever they are now, are doing
OK – and don’t consider me a totally indulgent bastard for getting on with my
review.
*********************
So – Waste, by Harvey Granville Barker. This
play – written by Shaw’s protégé (and gawd can you see the attraction between
these two heavyweight playwrights) – was originally censored back in 1907, ostensibly
due to the mention of back-street abortions although more likely down to
Granville Barker’s drippingly cynical take on the oily machinations of British
politics. Anyway, we begin in an England led by a frail Lib-Labour government,
with the Tory party ready to pounce in the wings. It all sounds thrillingly
familiar, doesn’t it? I guess it is – and there are moments that feel horribly pertinent
but there is a tidiness about the parallels being pulled out in this production
that sometimes feels a little wearying.
The hero and anti-hero, ideologue and
all-round selfish tosspot of our play is independent politician Henry Trebell,
played with hollow charm by Charles Edwards. This is a man with big ideas: he wants
to help the Tories put through a disestablishment bill and use the Church
for useful things like education. For now, at least, Trebell is the darling of
the Tory party, who are keen to sweep into power on the wave of big ideas. At
the beginning, we find Trebell engaged in a cool love affair with the flighty
and not-yet-divorced Amy O’Connell (Olivia Williams). Their flirtation plays
out on a black and shiny stage, with a huge moon gleaming overhead. Frankly, I
have no idea why that moon – designed by Hildegard Bechtler – is so damn big.
It looks like it might fall down at any moment and kill our two lovers on the
spot. In fact, I spent a lot of time trying to ‘work out’ Bechtler’s elegant
set, which can’t be good. Lots of the scenes play out on a vast black stage,
with two screens perched across the back. Sometimes – especially when we are
with the Tories – the stage looks like an odd romantic painting, with a piano perched
on a glimmering black floor and beautiful people draped in elegant positions. At
other times, the set feels more like an abstract piece of art and is punctuated
with stand-alone screens and concrete slabs. The only time the set opens out is
when Trebell sits at his office, huge and cream and beautiful. Perhaps Bechtler’s
design is meant to represent the limitations of Trebell’s work-obsessed
existence. Perhaps it is meant to suggest a clash between the old and the new. I’m
not entirely sure.
Anyway, Trebell and Amy flirt beneath that
giant moon and Trebell gets his dastardly way with her. Williams seems a tad
uncomfortable in the scene, as if she’s trying just a bit too hard to be ‘carefree’.
But the next encounter is much more interesting. Amy is pregnant and determined
to get rid of the baby. Trebbel ‘hates waste’ and is anti-abortion, although he
couldn’t give two hoots about the consequences the birth might have on Amy’s
life. It’s an ugly scene, with both characters as awful as they are
sympathetic. Williams really goes for it and she is desperate, shrill, brave,
cruel and bonkers. Edwards’ Trebell is a heroic vision in cream, a slimy
coward, a work-obsessed brute and a thoughtful gent. Ultimately, though,
Trebell’s work wins out. Those huge walls are pulled across for a meeting and,
when they are opened again, Amy has disappeared.
Act Two opens with an epic political pow-wow,
as Party Leader Horsham (Michael Elwyn) and his cronies decide the future of
Trebell – who is now immersed in scandal, following Anne’s death at the hands
of a botched abortion. You can practically feel Granville Barker getting hot
under the collar (and high-fiving Shaw in the process), as he sticks the knife
in the Tory politicians, as they slimily scheme to save their party. At one
point, O’Connell’s estranged husband cries out: ‘You’re all part of your age –
and you all voice the greed and folly of your age.’ We’re at the National so
obviously nobody whooped – but a part of me very much wanted to.
Edwards never tries too hard to make us like him. It’s terrible to watch him
suffer heart-break not at the loss of his lover and child – but at the loss of
his beloved dis-establishment bill. One feels deeply for the selfish bastard.
There’s a gorgeous scene near the close between Trebell and his devoted sister
Frances (Sylvestra Le Touzel), who Trebell only seems to notice now that he is
close to the end. Touzel’s Frances brims with hidden dignity and strength. In
the final scene, she sits alone at her brother’s desk. It’s a hopeful sign of
things to come, which – sadly – feels equally pertinent today.
Comments
Post a Comment