'Ten Billion' review or 'Which way to the lecture hall?'
'Ten
Billion', with Stephen Emmott
Royal
Court Theatre Upstairs, Wednesday 18th July 2012
Stephen Emmott and his facts. Photo Credit: Steve Cummiskey |
When
I was growing up, Katie Mitchell was my hero. If I could've bought a
poster of her, I would've put it bang above my bed. I'm not sure
which show kick-started my obsession but I remember leaving every
production tingling all over. I remember her shows making me so
excited about what theatre could do and how it make me feel.
Nowadays,
I often leave a Katie Mitchell production feeling pretty empty
inside. I also feel a little stupid, as if Mitchell's trying to say a
thousand things and I'm just not listening or watching in a way
that'll enable me to hear her. All I know is that sense of glee –
that life force that used jolt right through me during a Mitchell
production – isn't there any more. At least, not for me.
I'm
sure that 'Ten Billion' is a very clever and important show. I'm sure
that Stephen Emmott – a man so smart he doesn't even have to use
long words – is a committed and passionate researcher. I'm sure
that he has a lot of useful things to say about the state of our
planet and the hideous, vicious cycle of destruction we're currently
spinning around in. But I'm still not very sure about this show.
What
I really don't understand – and what I spent far too much time
questioning during this production – is if 'Ten Billion' is
actually meant to be a piece of theatre. We open on an unbelievably
realistic set, jammed with the manifold and meticulous details we've
come to expect of all of Mitchell's productions. The stage has been
turned into an exact replica of Stephen Emmott's office in Cambridge
and I've no doubt the angle of every 'haphazard' folder corresponds
exactly with the original.
And
then the lecture begins. Stephen Emmott announces very early on that
he is no actor but a genuine professor. The trouble is, it takes me
quite a while to believe him. Mitchell is such a playful but
deliberate director that I become convinced this supposed 'lack of an
act' might, in reality, be a very elaborate act indeed. It might
sound like I'm overthinking matters - but it's hard not to overthink
things when you're watching the show of a director who really, really
likes to get you thinking.
Already,
then, my mind is asking the sort of questions that distract from the
show's purpose. I'm asking whether Mitchell is making a point by
creating this realistic set; whether she's trying to say something
about the false reality we all accept, when we pretend our planet
isn't going to hell. I'm asking whether this professor is in fact an
actor and whether our unthinking acceptance of his authority is meant
to reflect our glazed acceptance of all the global warming spiel. I'm
wondering where the catch is.
It
turn out there isn't one. This really is a genuine lecture and the
whole set – the whole Royal Court Theatre in fact – doesn't
really add much. Sure, a few slides are chucked into the mix but
they're nothing particularly flashy. Perhaps this restraint is meant
to add to our fear; after all, why use snazzy theatrical effects,
when the terrifying facts (we're taking far too much from our planet
and not putting anything good back in) speak plainly enough for
themselves.
But
why, then, has Katie Mitchell put this lecture on a stage? And why
has she tried, at least in part, to make it look like a piece of
theatre? No matter how passionately Mitchell obviously feels about
this topic, 'Ten Billion' hasn't really got me thinking about the
state of the world. It's got me worrying about the state of theatre.
Time and again, it seems that directors and writers are turning to
lectures or journalistic rants in order to discuss the most important
issues of our times. Why aren't they looking towards the theatre?
Comments
Post a Comment